conflicted file in update this morning?
Kevin Fenzi
kevin at scrye.com
Mon Aug 3 17:32:39 UTC 2009
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009 10:30:43 -0700
Alan Evans <ame.fedora at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> > iirc
> > bold=going to be installed
> > normal=updating
>
> That can't be it. Today's updates were all already installed packages.
> Where should users go to find out? It's in none of the docs that I can
> find.
>
> From my current evidence, it seems to be:
>
> bold=set to be updated
> normal=set to be updated, unless you're using PackageKit to do the
> update.
>
> I'm almost tempted to think that this is the actual meaning...
man yum.conf
search down for 'color'. It lists the options and what the defaults
are.
> -Alan
kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20090803/4961dbc5/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list