F12 Live CHECKSUM failing

Sawrub luckysharma11 at gmail.com
Thu Dec 17 18:21:22 UTC 2009


On 12/17/2009 11:50 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Sawrub<luckysharma11 at gmail.com>  wrote:
>    
>> I downloaded the Fedora-12-x86_64-Live.iso using the torrent client, taking
>> the torrent from
>> http://torrent.fedoraproject.org/torrents//Fedora-12-x86_64-Live.torrent.
>> But the creation of bootable USB was not possible as the iso verification
>> failed message came up in the USB creator.
>> Verifying the iso following the steps at
>> 'https://fedoraproject.org/en/verify' also resulted in vain. Please help me
>> so that the b/w does not goes wasted.
>>
>> [sawrub at mybox Fedora-12-x86_64-Live]$ ll
>> total 671756
>> -rw-rw-r--  1 sawrub sawrub       966 2009-12-17 22:34
>> Fedora-12-x86_64-Live-CHECKSUM
>> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 sawrub sawrub 687865856 2009-12-03 00:18
>> Fedora-12-x86_64-Live.iso
>> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 sawrub sawrub       152 2009-12-02 23:50 README-SOURCES
>>
>> [sawrub at mybox Fedora-12-x86_64-Live]$ curl
>> https://fedoraproject.org/static/fedora.gpg | gpg --import
>>   % Total    % Received % Xferd  Average Speed   Time    Time     Time
>>   Current
>>                                  Dload  Upload   Total   Spent    Left  Speed
>> 100  9323  100  9323    0     0   4396      0  0:00:02  0:00:02 --:--:--
>>   8696
>> gpg: key 4EBFC273: "Fedora (10)<fedora at fedoraproject.org>" not changed
>> gpg: key 0B86274E: "Fedora (10 testing)<fedora at fedoraproject.org>" not
>> changed
>> gpg: key D22E77F2: "Fedora (11)<fedora at fedoraproject.org>" not changed
>> gpg: key 57BBCCBA: "Fedora (12)<fedora at fedoraproject.org>" not changed
>> gpg: key 217521F6: "Fedora EPEL<epel at fedoraproject.org>" not changed
>> gpg: Total number processed: 5
>> gpg:              unchanged: 5
>>
>> [sawrub at mybox Fedora-12-x86_64-Live]$ gpg --verify *-CHECKSUM
>> gpg: Signature made Tue 10 Nov 2009 01:26:40 AM IST using RSA key ID
>> 57BBCCBA
>> gpg: Good signature from "Fedora (12)<fedora at fedoraproject.org>"
>> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
>> gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
>> owner.
>> Primary key fingerprint: 6BF1 78D2 8A78 9C74 AC0D  C63B 9D1C C348 57BB CCBA
>> [sawrub at mybox Fedora-12-x86_64-Live]$
>>      
> Well, I'm not going to say that the above is not a problem as I saw
> the same thing when using the same steps, however, nothing you have
> done so far has anything to do directly with the ISO. That doesn't
> happen until you do:
>
> sha256sum *-CHECKSUM
>    
Here is the rest of the step.
[sawrub at mybox Fedora-12-x86_64-Live]$ sha256sum *-CHECKSUM
3b74f72a6ad75eb8dc849503e9e76569bec37b5677847f98659120f1072c7944  
Fedora-12-x86_64-Live-CHECKSUM
[sawrub at mybox Fedora-12-x86_64-Live]$
> When I actually found very confusing because if you look in the file
> the headers shows "SHA1" not "SHA256" and there are commands for both
> "sha1sum" and "sha256sum".
>
>    
Yes the header is SHA1
> Everything you've shown in your email has to do with verifying the
> source of the CHECKSUM data, not comparing the CHECKSUM data to the
> ISO.
>
>    
Signature itself failing the test, kicked me down.
> Richard
>
>    

-- 
Saurabh Sharma
Linux user number: 490644
http://sawrub-blog.blogspot.com/
Open your doors.......It's time to look beyond Windows




More information about the fedora-list mailing list