Where is 2.6.32?

[Konstantin Svist]

On 12/31/2009 09:10 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> And leaves you with no Fedora patches and the disk performance
> regression issues of 2.6.32. Also a tainted kernel which some
> developers will ignore if you get a trace, etc.

I thought it's only tainted if there are non-GPL modules compiled in.
For instance, I saw the tainted message whenever I insmod'ed fglrx driver