Network interfaces refusing to start on boot: F10
Craig White
craigwhite at azapple.com
Tue Jan 6 19:46:06 UTC 2009
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 14:05 -0500, Mark Haney wrote:
> Tom Horsley wrote:
> > On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 11:30:40 -0500
> > Mark Haney wrote:
> >
> >> I mean, why offer
> >> the options in 's-c-n' if they aren't going to be implemented?
> >
> > Because virtually everything in the vicinity of NetworkManager
> > is broken and needs another year or so of development to
> > work right? :-).
> >
>
> Good Lord, if it's taken this long to make it even semi-functional, why
> bother? I mean as far as I'm concerned NM is a joke.
----
One of NetworkManager's missions is to utterly frustrate and harass
those that make no effort whatsoever to understand it's purpose and just
want to muscle everything as root like they've always done.
I agree that it's much easier to just disable it and then dismiss it as
broken than it is to actually figure out what it's good for and how to
live with it.
I would bet dollars to doughnuts that everyone who dismisses
NetworkManager out of hand also disables SELinux too.
Craig
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list