No system-config-display, so what now?

Timothy Murphy gayleard at eircom.net
Wed Jan 14 13:28:45 UTC 2009


Rahul Sundaram wrote:

>> I expect it's because having an xorg.conf is now discouraged, but as
>> often
>> happens, many of us have hardware that can't really do without it.  I'm
>> sure the day is coming - but it's not here yet :-)
> 
> We will get there faster, if people report bugs when autoconfiguration
> does not work. It doesn't yet on systems where the hardware reports it
> incorrectly, returns junk data or no data at all for instance but we can
> still make it work if we knew the hardware details. In a report, you can
> file the output of lspci, /var/log/Xorg.log without a custom xorg.conf
> and any further information you want to provide.
> 
> system-config-display is a bandaid from the time when XFree86 was
> stagnating badly but now that Xorg is going rapid development, it makes
> sense to fix the underlying issues instead.

I don't understand the anti xorg.conf argument.
If in fact X can be set up automatically,
then presumably xorg.conf can be written automatically.
Then, in the hopefully few cases where this does not work,
xorg.conf can be edited by hand.






More information about the fedora-list mailing list