anyone knowing procmail very good?

[Anne Wilson]

On Tuesday 27 January 2009 18:53:59 Christoph Höger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have the following in .procmailrc:
> (on a pretty bad administrated solaris box running procmail v3.22
> 2001/09/10)
>
> #fedora-devel
>
> :0
>
> * ^Sender:.*fedora-devel-list-bounces at redhat.com
> * ^TO_fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> fedora-devel
>
>
> This works well in nearly all cases except for some announcements (e.g.
> the "The fonts SIG irregular status report" mail from today)
>
Not knowing the details of those posts, I don't know the reason, but I *think* 
your recipe demands that both conditions are met.  Are they?

> Somehow those messages (although they contain Sender:
> fedora-devel-list-bounces at redhat.com) slip through that rule.
>
Try re-writing that as

> #fedora-devel
> :0
> * (^Sender|To|List-ID): .*fedora-devel-list
> fedora-devel

It should pick up both sets, as it asks that any one of those three fields 
contain 'fedora-devel-list'

Anne
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20090127/48ce46e1/attachment-0001.sig>