F10 - kernel build problem

[g]

Bill Davidsen wrote:

> I have not done it in a few months, but before that I built my own since RH8 and 
> FC4 in that series.

i would not say that it is not possible. it is just that because fedora does
customize their software, it is best to stay with fedora source to insure
that compatibility remains.

you would not expect suse or mandrake [extremes] source to be compatibility
with fedora, therefore why should kernel.org?

-- 
peace out.

tc,hago.

g
.

****
in a free world without fences, who needs gates.
**
help microsoft stamp out piracy - give linux to a friend today
**
to mess up a linux box, you need to work at it;
to mess up an ms windows box, you just need to *look at* it.
**
learn linux:
'Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition' http://rute.2038bug.com/index.html
'The Linux Documentation Project' http://www.tldp.org/
'LDP HOWTO-index' http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/HOWTO-INDEX/index.html
'HowtoForge' http://howtoforge.com/
****

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20090129/3a496166/attachment-0001.sig>