Update revisor

[Jeroen van Meeuwen]

Frank Murphy wrote:
> Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
>> You may be interested in participating in our Test Team even if only you
>> report your upgrade from Fedora 8 went good or bad.
>>
>> http://lists.fedoraunity.org/pipermail/test-team/2009-January/000304.html
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Jeroen van Meeuwen
>> -kanarip
>>
> 
> Hi Jeroen,
> 
> I would like to get involved with Unity testing.
> Will be getting a couple of boxes purely for that.
> 
> What I was wondering is, (similar to previous poster)
> Is if in co-operation with PackageKit.
> If the Unity disks could be used as a formal u\g path,
> for the freemedia program.
> (As Unity states it is not officially sponsored, as a result of which we
> cannot avail of them in that situ.)
> 
> But if they could be seen as a viable u\g, along with official Disk?
> 
> We can move this to Amb-list if you fell it more appropriate.
> 

Hi Frank,

I'm not sure I understand exactly what you mean, but here it goes;

As far as the Fedora Unity Re-Spins is concerned, co-operation with 
PackageKit stretches as far as the co-operation between PackageKit and 
General Availability media (the media officially released and 
distributed by the Fedora Project).

The FreeMedia program has been using some of the Fedora Unity Re-Spins 
in the past, so it might be possible for anyone to obtain the Fedora 
Unity Re-Spins through the FreeMedia program -if they offer them. If 
they do not offer the Fedora Unity Re-Spins, one might request them 
explicitly but the FreeMedia program may choose to not ship Fedora Unity 
Re-Spins.

Now, I don't know what you mean by "u\g", but the Fedora Unity Re-Spins 
are tested extensively for different types of installations, and 
different types of upgrades as well. So, if "u\g" means "upgrade"; yes, 
the Fedora Unity Re-Spins are viable media to perform upgrades with.

I hope that answers your questions, but if not, don't hesitate ;-)

Kind regards,

Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip