eth0 alias issue
T. Howell-Cintron
fedora-list at kathera.com
Fri Jul 24 03:32:27 UTC 2009
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
>
> Dumb question - shouldn't DEVICE be eth0 in both files? I thought it
> was the name of the physical device.
>
> DEVICE=<name of physical device (except dynamically-allocated PPP
> devices where it is the "logical name")>
>
>
You're correct - I wasn't paying attention. I've tried it without
specifying DEVICE in ifcfg-eth0:1 but came up with the same results.
Thanks,
Tom
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list