From the top... how do I get sound working in F11 ?

Bill Davidsen davidsen at tmr.com
Sat Jul 25 04:22:27 UTC 2009


Linuxguy123 wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 10:55 -0400, William Case wrote:
>> Hi Linuxguy123;
>>
>> On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 12:22 -0600, Linuxguy123 wrote:
>>> I've been using F11 since it came out and it works great. But I haven't
>>> had any sound since I did the upgrade.  Sound worked great in F10. Its
>>> getting old not having sound.  How do I get it working ?
>>>
> 
> <snip>
> 
>>> How should I proceed from here ?
>> I have very much the same problem.
>>
>> I have filed a bug regarding it.
>> The bug is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511178
>>
>> Check /var/log/messages and see if you can find a warning or error
>> similar to:
>>
>> "
>> ...
>> pulseaudio[2182]: alsa-sink.c: Increasing minimal latency to 1.00ms
>> pulseaudio[2182]: alsa-sink.c: Increasing minimal
>> latency to 2.00 ms
>> pulseaudio[2182]: alsa-sink.c: Increasing minimal
>> latency to 4.00 ms
>> pulseaudio[2182]: alsa-sink.c: ALSA woke us up to
>> write new data to the device, but there was actually nothing to write!
>> pulseaudio[2182]: alsa-sink.c: Most likely this is
>> a bug in the ALSA driver 'snd_hda_intel'. Please report this issue to
>> the ALSA developers.
>> pulseaudio[2182]: alsa-sink.c: We were woken up with POLLOUT set --
>> however a subsequent snd_pcm_avail() returned 0 or another value <
>> min_avail.
>> ...
>> "
>> If so, it matches my bug.  A bug search on Alsa, pulseaudio and alsa-lib
>> shows many recent similar problems.
>>
>> I filed bug 511178 two days ago but have received no response yet.  If
>> it is appropriate (i.e. the same issue) I would appreciate your adding a
>> comment to the bug.
> 
> I think my situation is a bit different.
> 
>>From /var/log/messages:
> 
> ========================================================================
> Jul 15 06:38:11 localhost pulseaudio[2989]: alsa-sink.c: ALSA woke us up
> to write new data to the device, but there was actually nothing to
> write!
> 
> Jul 15 06:38:11 localhost pulseaudio[2989]: alsa-sink.c: Most likely
> this is a bug in the ALSA driver 'snd_hda_intel'. Please report this
> issue to the ALSA developers.
> 
> Jul 15 06:38:11 localhost pulseaudio[2989]: alsa-sink.c: We were woken
> up with POLLOUT set -- however a subsequent snd_pcm_avail() returned 0
> or another value < min_avail.
> 
> Jul 15 06:38:14 localhost pulseaudio[2989]: reserve-wrap.c: Failed to
> acquire reservation lock on device 'Audio0': Input/output error
> 
> Jul 15 06:38:20 localhost pulseaudio[2989]: reserve-wrap.c: Failed to
> acquire reservation lock on device 'Audio0': Input/output error
> 
> Jul 15 06:38:20 localhost pulseaudio[2989]: alsa-source.c: ALSA woke us
> up to read new data from the device, but there was actually nothing to
> read!
> 
> Jul 15 06:38:20 localhost pulseaudio[2989]: alsa-source.c: Most likely
> this is a bug in the ALSA driver 'snd_hda_intel'. Please report this
> issue to the ALSA developers.
> 
> Jul 15 06:38:20 localhost pulseaudio[2989]: alsa-source.c: We were woken
> up with POLLIN set -- however a subsequent snd_pcm_avail() returned 0 or
> another value < min_avail.
> 
> Jul 15 06:38:33 localhost pulseaudio[2989]: reserve-wrap.c: Failed to
> acquire reservation lock on device 'Audio0': Input/output error
> 
> ===========================================================================
> 
> I am wondering if your problem wouldn't be solved by manually setting
> the latency times as they do in the following post:
> 
> http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=225660
> 
This is the most readable thing I've seen on PA, until I've tried it on all my 
machines I don't want to comment on how well it works, or doesn't, because old 
drivers which worked in 2.6.22 are long gone.

Great job of writing this up, in any case!

-- 
Bill Davidsen <davidsen at tmr.com>
   "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot




More information about the fedora-list mailing list