fedora 11 worst then ever release

[solarflow99]

On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Ben Boeckel <MathStuf at gmail.com> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Farkas Levente wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Alan Cox
> <alan at lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> >> "all of my system has a wrong openssl version"
> >>
> >> all these symptoms sound like your upgrade went horribly
> wrong. I've seen
> >> preupgrade mash up a box by half upgrading like that. It's
> the main reason
> >> I don't think preupgrade is actually safe to use yet.
> >>
> >
> > i use fedora install dvd in this case! if it's do a half
> upgrade then  it's
> > also the bug of the installer.
> >
> >
> >> "i already install f11 yum show 2069 packages to update!!!
> just one month
> >> after the release! my system consist of 2059"
> >>
> >> In other words your box didn't update to F11 in the first
> place, it just
> >> updated a few things and exploded, which is what it tends to
> do. You were
> >> basically running FC10 and a few random bits of FC11.
> >
> >
> > as i wrote i use fedora install dvd! if it's jusr updated a
> few things then
> > it's also the bug of the installer.
>
> This is a problem with the DVD that is hard to solve. Fully
> updated F10 is newer than F11 was when the DVD was spun
> (especially when the DVD is a month old)...so not everything got
> updated. There was a thread on it earlier on this list. It
> either breaks other things to fix or the DVD is just broken to
> update from after X days of release.
>

so you're not the only one with F11 problems, I cant even install it, the
bug isn't being looked at either, there nothing I can do.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508465
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20090726/cadd7e49/attachment-0001.htm>