[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Firefox 3.5 final?



On 7/6/2009 7:46 AM, Joshua C. wrote:
> 2009/7/6 David <brusefamelion gmail com>:
>> On 7/6/2009 4:51 AM, Joshua C. wrote:
>>> 2009/7/5 Patrick O'Callaghan <pocallaghan gmail com>:
>>>> On Sun, 2009-07-05 at 10:41 +0200, Joshua C. wrote:
>>>>> 2009/7/5 Patrick O'Callaghan <pocallaghan gmail com>:
>>>>>> On Sun, 2009-07-05 at 02:44 +0200, Joshua C. wrote:
>>>> [...]>> Any chances F9 and F10 to get this firefox. they're stuck with 3.0.11?
>>>>>> I would think there's no chance of F9, as it's about to lose support.
>>>>>> Don't know about F10.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> poc
>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>>> I know, but the versions for f11/f12 were compiled on June, 30. there
>>>>> is time and I don't want to recompile it by myself, because the
>>>>> package isn't that small. I hope this can be reconsidered.
>>>> Have you tried simply running the binary from the Mozilla site? I've
>>>> often done this. Not ideal because it isn't within the Fedora package
>>>> system, but certainly doable.
>>>>
>>>> poc
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> fedora-list mailing list
>>>> fedora-list redhat com
>>>> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>>>> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
>>>>
>>>  I tried it but there are some plugins that have dep-problems (libgpod
>>> especially)
>>
>> libgpod is available for Fedora 9 & 10, as well as Fedora 11. In both
>> x86 and x86_64 archs.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>>  David
>>
>> --
>> fedora-list mailing list
>> fedora-list redhat com
>> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
>>
> I know. There are newer versions for f11/12. Mplayer, gecko s.n.
> depend on the newer versions. An simple upgrade cannot work because
> they want a particular version. Lots of other packages need to be
> recompiled, too. Once this is done in koji, all deps will be
> recompiled automatically.
> 
> It's not just libgpod that is causing the problems.
> 


I can not see this happening for Fedora 9. A lot of work for a very
soon, 07-10-2009, to be EOL release. I would have to look but I have
read that since Fedora 11 was delayed so long that Rawhide to Fedora 12
will have short time span. Means Fedora 10 is soon to be EOL also.

-- 


  David


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]