OT google chrome OS [was Re: Graphics card recommendation?]
Robert P. J. Day
rpjday at crashcourse.ca
Thu Jul 9 06:09:42 UTC 2009
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009, Mauriat Miranda wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Robert P. J. Day<rpjday at crashcourse.ca> wrote:
> > On Wed, 8 Jul 2009, Tom Horsley wrote:
> >> On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 14:50:02 -0400 (EDT)
> >> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >> > but what's their target market? if you can install chrome on
> >> > any other distro (you can, right?), how exactly do they plan on
> >> > breaking into the market, unless they go hard at getting onto
> >> > netbooks?
> >> That's the only target they mention in their blog. They say they
> >> already have partners signed up to offer preinstalled chrome.
> > just for fun, i decided to install the chromium browser on my f11
> > x86_64 system. first, the prebuilt binaries are 32-bit only, so doing
> > a yum install would have dragged down dozens of megabytes of i586
> > packages with it.
> > however, grabbing the src package and trying to build it also didn't
> > help, since the only supported arches in the spec file are ix86 and
> > arm. unless i'm reading it incorrectly. does an x86_64 build of
> > their browser exist for f11?
> yet? or has issues in 64bit. So use 32bit or wait (I'm guessing
> 64bit support is low in the priority list).
i think i'll wait. i don't feel like loading up my x86_64 box with
72 packages and 47M of i586 content just to see what that browser
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry.
Web page: http://crashcourse.ca
Linked In: http://www.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
More information about the fedora-list