mailing list pgp signatures...

[Tim]

On Sun, 2009-07-12 at 09:47 -0700, Les wrote:
>         One might make it more robust and not pass on unregistered
> emails, nor those that do not pass verification (whatever that may end
> up being).
> 
>         But that would be the end of spammers as they would have to
> register, and be verified.  There are too many interests with cash in
> hand to make that realistic.  Any thoughts?

Something tells me that spammers would still be around even if they did
have to sign messages.  There'd probably still be enough profit in it
for the bastards.  And they'd use the excuse that people who didn't want
their spam had yet another technical means to filter out their mail.

-- 
[tim at localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.  I
read messages from the public lists.