Fedora 11: Switching to single user mode (runlevel 1) -- Hey g.
Tim
ignored_mailbox at yahoo.com.au
Tue Jul 14 06:42:35 UTC 2009
On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 12:48 -0500, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
> The only person that I can seeing being rude is G.
That's not my recollection.
> He was asked to either publish his public key, or stop signing his
> messages to the list. A reasonable request if he wants to be part of
> the com unity.
I'd have used words a bit stronger than /just/ being asked. Giving an
ultimatum isn't being very polite.
> He could even have posted an ASCII armored copy of his public key to
> the list.
I don't recall seeing anyone asking him to do that, nor him refusing to
do that. Perhaps you might ask him, and *then* see what happens.
I've seen demands to upload a key to a keyserver, and I fully understand
anybody's objection to doing that. Posting a key in here wouldn't
subject that person to the spam problems that some keyservers create.
Though, it still wouldn't be a very trustworthy public key to add to
your keyring.
> But he demanded that we send him an email asking for his
> key. This is being polite? Get real...
You do realise that (a) asking someone to send you their PGP key if you
want it is a very old and quite standard, way to get their key. You're
being a bit uppity at not liking that option. And, (b), it's up to the
person to decide whether they want to give their PGP key out to someone
else.
> But I guess asking anyone to be a good list member is not acceptable
> on this list any more. If you point out the list guidelines and ask
> that people follow them, you are labeled a NET NAZI.
That all rather depends on how the asking, and pointing out, takes
place.
> Politeness is sadly lacking from some members.
Yes.
--
[tim at localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686
Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I
read messages from the public lists.
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list