lightweight spam filter

Steven W. Orr steveo at syslang.net
Thu Jul 16 21:41:35 UTC 2009


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 07/16/09 15:33, quoth Christoph Höger:
> Hi,
> 
> is there a lightweight spam filter out there that works well with
> postfix?
> Especially important would be to whitelist some servers I forward mail
> from that already run a spamfilter.
> 
> regards
> 
> christoph
> 

I'm going to weigh in on this one too. Signature and all. ;-)

I'm going to declare the question as flawed. You can do a fair amount of
decision making right in the SMTP server. After that, you can do as much as
you want given the limits of what you are willing to use. In this case, you
use the word lightweight with no clear idea of what it is you think exceeds
the definition. ClamAV is lightweight in that it is almost trivial to
configure, big fat hairy footprint however. Spamassassin does a good job and
can take a bit of work ot configure and can add a bit of load, depending on
how much you want it to do. I filter out all the stuff that's in asian
languages and self declared spammers right in sendmail before it even gets to
spam analysis. I'd suggest elaborating more on what your goals are.

- --
Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have  .0.
happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Organ ..0
Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are all- 000
individuals! What if this weren't a hypothetical question?
steveo at syslang.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkpfno8ACgkQRIVy4fC+NyTUjgCfSM/k7QP597fVjXo9z4rLASL/
OBEAoI/6MmTB5Op5iE7bjHlwLf8qfSjB
=bRxV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the fedora-list mailing list