[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Linux "NULL pointer dereferece" in the News...

On Sunday 19 July 2009, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>On 07/19/2009 11:31 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
>> On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 23:11:52 +0530
>> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>> It is not so simple. This is not a compiler bug. I suggest you read
>>> through http://lwn.net/Articles/341773/rss to understand why.
>> I did. It is a compiler bug no matter what a bunch of language lawyer
>> holier than thou compiler developers say :-).
>The kernel developers claim it is a kernel bug and the compiler
>developers claim it is not their bug and this everybody agrees with and
>yet you don't agree with all of them? Who is being holier than thou here?
>Kernel first dereferences a pointer, and after that checks whether it's
>NULL.  It is quite common as a compiler optimization to compile out code
>like this.

Ok, so what is the option to pass to the compiler to tell it not to do this?

Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
The NRA is offering FREE Associate memberships to anyone who wants them.

Nothing endures but change.
		-- Heraclitus

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]