[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: 60% of Fedora packages obsolete

On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Rahul
Sundaram<sundaram fedoraproject org> wrote:
> On 07/21/2009 01:36 AM, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
>> Article: http://oswatershed.org/
>> That's much higher than I would have guessed. I suppose Fedora is no
>> longer as fast paced as it used to be. Arch seems to be the innovating
>> distro now.
> Not shipping the very latest in the "stable" release of Fedora is by no
> means equivalent to obsolete. Arch is definitely more bleeding edge
> being a rolling distribution however.
> Rahul

I've always found that some Fedora policies are far from as bleeding
edge as observers would believe.

However, this seems to place Fedora in a weird position -- between
what most now consider to be the bleeding edge distro, Arch,. and what
many consider to be the stable distro, Ubuntu. What niche does fedora
intend to fullfill?

Fedora 10

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]