[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: fedora 11 worst then ever release



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

oleksandr korneta wrote:

> on 07/25/2009 11:46 AM Chuck Anderson wrote:
> 
>> 
>> I don't even upgrade anymore.  I just keep two partitions 
(Logical
>> Volumes actually)--one for Fedora N and one for Fedora N+1.
>> 
> 
> interesting idea. Do you keep the same home for both?
> 
> I don't do upgrades either, since the time rh9 to fc1 didn't 
work for
> me. But I dont complain, kind of got used to the idea that 
fedora is not
> made for upgrades. However, fresh install every time takes too 
much time
> for  deploying all the old tweaked configs and stuff... so I 
switch
> between versions just once a year, from f N to f n+2, keeping 
two
> consequent  version of fedora on two different machines.

Since it seems everyone else is posting their setups, why not.

I have two machines, one leading (L) and the other "dragging" 
behind (D). L jumps ship to rawhide soon after rawhide while D 
chugs along on current release updates and cherry picks from 
updates-testing if necessary to fix things. D is usually used 
via VNC. All of the actual work is done on D and testing new 
stuff on L. So I just keep a full /home on D and a bare one on 
L.

- --Ben
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkpsWgMACgkQiPi+MRHG3qTuvACfdPtoYss+Lj7a5L60Mai2mr81
68AAoJon/RWXaqQhieuQomo1Y7rRC5Bi
=6tyw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]