F11 bind-chroot - a question?

[Craig White]

On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 15:14 -0700, Mike Cloaked wrote:
> 
> 
> Mike Cloaked wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > As you say the files in /etc need symlinking to /var/named/chroot/... but
> > I don't know how this plays with selinux - maybe they are linked in a
> > different way to previous versions?
> > 
> > 
> 
> OK I checked the contents of the bind-chroot package in both F10 and f11  -  
> 
> In F11 the contents contain
> /var/named/chroot and within this directory are
> /dev containing file null, random and zero
> and /etc containing file localtime
> and nothing else.
> 
> In F10 the contents contain
> /usr/sbin/bind-chroot-admin
> and /var/named/chroot and within this directory are
> /dev containing file null, random and zero
> /etc/ containing files named.conf, named.rfc1912.zones and rndc.key
> /var/ containing log/named.log
> and also containing named/ containing named.ca, named.empty, named.localhost
> and named.loopback
> 
> So yes quite a big difference in the bind-chroot package in F11 - and lots
> "not there" compared to F10
> 
> Can anyone enlighten me on why there is such a huge difference?
----
file a bugzilla report...I think it's a packaging error.

Craig


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.