Warning against preupgrade
Sam Varshavchik
mrsam at courier-mta.com
Fri Jun 26 00:23:14 UTC 2009
David writes:
> On 6/25/2009 6:11 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>> Alan Cox writes:
>>
>>> On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 04:07:07 -0700
>>> Kevin Bowling <kevinb at analograils.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> 2 out of 5 failures. F10->F11 is completely unusable for any kind of
>>>> "uncommon" setup, i.e. LDAP login, Linux RAID, Xen DomU. Anything
>>>> other than one IDE hard disk with default layout really.
>>>
>>> 2 out of 5 ? - I got 3 out of 4 fails including hitting error paths that
>>> clearly were not tested because the error printing code didn't work but
>>> spewed python traces - and yes its in bugzilla already.
>>
>> By the time I'm done, I expect 5 for 5 failures (so far, I'm 2 out of
>> 2). Starting with F9, Anaconda reliably failed to install grub for me,
>> on every one of my machines, despite that they're all different. Some
>> have one IDE hard drive, others use softraid on top of a pair of SCSI
>> drives. Some are i386, others x86_64. There is no common denominator
>> that I can see.
>>
>> So far, now with F11, on the first two machines, Anaconda keeps failing
>> to install Grub, so I have to do it. I have no reason to believe that
>> the remaining three won't be any different.
>
> Say this again please? "By the time I'm done, I expect 5 for 5
> failures".
Right.
> Are you crazy.
I'm pretty sure I'm not.
> "By the time I'm done, I expect 5 for 5
> failures". The odds sux!
Yes, but I'm not playing the roulette.
> How many failures would expect from clean, fresh installs?
Dunno -- haven't done fresh installs in a long time.
> Would a "clean, fresh install" and then have to reconfigure
> 'something/any/many things, be a disaster?
Yes -- since I'd lose all the data I've accumulated, over the years.
> As opposed to an "By the time
> I'm done, I expect 5 for 5 failures" upgrade followed by a "clean, fresh
> install?", as opposed to a fresh install to begin with first, and a
> re-configure after?
It's not too bad. Although, as I've said, Anaconda barfs when trying to
install grub, I've now gotten the routine down pat. Takes only a minute or
two, to fix it up. Much easier than wiping and doing a fresh install.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20090625/4f98f0a3/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list