dependencies/conflicts on regular Fedora 10

[Antonio Olivares]

--- On Tue, 3/3/09, Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu> wrote:

> From: Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu>
> Subject: Re: dependencies/conflicts on regular Fedora 10
> To: fedora-list at redhat.com
> Date: Tuesday, March 3, 2009, 6:20 AM
> Antonio Olivares wrote:
> 
> > Tried to update Fedora 10 x86_64, but
> > 
> > --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> > digikam-libs-0.10.0-0.6.beta5.fc10.x86_64 from
> installed has depsolving
> > problems
> >   --> Missing Dependency: libkipi.so.5()(64bit) is
> needed by package
> >   digikam-libs-0.10.0-0.6.beta5.fc10.x86_64
> (installed)
> > digikam-0.10.0-0.6.beta5.fc10.x86_64 from installed
> has depsolving
> > problems
> >   --> Missing Dependency: libkipi.so.5()(64bit) is
> needed by package
> >   digikam-0.10.0-0.6.beta5.fc10.x86_64 (installed)
> > Error: Missing Dependency: libkipi.so.5()(64bit) is
> needed by package
> > digikam-0.10.0-0.6.beta5.fc10.x86_64 (installed)
> Error: Missing
> > Dependency: libkipi.so.5()(64bit) is needed by package
> > digikam-libs-0.10.0-0.6.beta5.fc10.x86_64 (installed)
> 
> I can confirm that the latest digikam, kdegraphics pkgs in
> stable updates
> install/update without conflicts:
> digikam-0.10.0-0.16.rc1.fc10
> kdegraphics-4.2.0-1.fc10
> 
> Your errors you provide don't seem to be complete, but
> from what I can tell,
> digikam-0.10-0.6 is currently installed, and the update
> operation is trying
> update something else (kdegraphics probably), and not
> include digikam in
> the transaction for some reason.
> 
> -- Rex
> 
> -- 

The updates came in.  The point made that it is regular Fedora 10 and "not rawhide", I expect to see conflicts and broken deps on rawhide(which I run and not Fedora 10). I updated two other machines and the updates came in beautifully only this machine but the updates are in :)  Thanks!

Regards,

Antonio