without a truly working "jigdo", re-spins are effectively useless

[Bill Crawford]

On Wednesday 11 March 2009 15:17:53 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
...
> <slight rant on>
>
>   technically, i know that, but perhaps red hat should start
> protecting its brand a bit more aggressively.  go to fedoraunity.org:
>
>   http://fedoraunity.org/
>
> everything about that site screams "fedora".  the name.  the icon.
> the colour scheme.  the wording:
>
>   Welcome to the Fedora Unity Project
>   by The Fedora Unity Team — last modified Dec 13, 2007 07:09 PM
>
>   sorry, but i just don't have much patience with someone telling me
> that those two things are in no way connected.  if fedora wants to
> disavow any connection to fedora unity, it should demand that the
> unity site doesn't work so hard to look like fedora.  or at least have
> a *major* disclaimer at the very top making that clear.
>
> </rant>

It might pay them to move the following item to the *top* of the "re-spins" 
page ... and emphasise the word "unofficial" :o)

Who produces the Re-Spins? Are they official Fedora Project releases?   —  by 
The Fedora Unity Team  — last modified Mar 11, 2008 08:29 AM  

The Fedora Unity Project, which is an unofficial community project, produces the 
Re-Spins using packages and processes from the official Fedora Project.