fedora LTS , why not?

[Armin]

On Thursday 19 March 2009 05:35:16 Adel ESSAFI wrote:
> Hi list
>
>
> I was using fedora and redhat since 2000. To day, I can see that our
> favorite distro is really very strong. However, I have done some experience
> (short) with Ubuntu and I have liked to LTS concept (Long Term support).
>
> My idea is to build a distribution that is based on Fedora at 100% with
> 1. LTS
> 2. with a very reduce number of packages
> 3. with proprietary codecs and essentiel software (mp3, flash ) included
> in.
>
> I know that the variety of the open source projects are making it's power.
> However, I aim to build a distribution with only one software from each
> catégory. That is, I have to choose between:
> *  KDE and GNOME for the destop
> * rhythembox , kaffeine, ....... as media player
> * abiword or openoffice as office writer
> .............................................
>
> Technically, I will maintain a repository  with a reduced number of
> packages.
>
>
> If I get positive feed back from this list, I can start working on this
> project in july
>
> This distribution will be very useful for starter!!
>
> Best regards
> Adel
>
>
> --
> http://ilovefedora.blogspot.com/

That, my friend, is called RHEL. :)

-- 
Armin Moradi