Virtual Box
Paul W. Frields
stickster at gmail.com
Fri Mar 20 21:48:06 UTC 2009
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 05:14:55PM -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 13:32:23 -0700
> Aldo Foot wrote:
>
> > I think VirtualBox may be preferred because it appears more
> > manageable in the surface.
>
> A friend at work who uses it says it is vastly easier to
> do things like pass USB devices through to the virtual hardware
> with VirtualBox than with anything else he has tried,
> so he can do things like use Windows scanner software for
> scanners not supported by anything in linux.
I agree, USB devices are easier to pass through to VirtualBox --
however, I'm testing Rawhide on my personal machine starting this
weekend, which is very close to F11 Beta right now. I'll try to let
the list know what improvements I see in USB device connections to the
guest.
--
Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20090320/8bfe3f28/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list