Question about whehter xinetd is still used.

[Todd Zullinger]

Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> You should file bug reports if that's the case.

Well, in the git-daemon case, I'm now one of the maintainers.  So I
can more easily fix the problem directly. ;)

I think there are some valid reasons for packages to drop files into
/etc/xinet.d and not require xinetd, but whether each of the 14 or so
packages that currently do so should be doing so needs looking into.
I posted the repoquery results in case others who use the various
packages want to look closer and perhaps file bugs where appropriate.

-- 
Todd        OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If a government were put in charge of the Sahara Desert, within five
years they'd have a shortage of sand.
    -- Dr. Milton Friedman

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 542 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20090526/aa945781/attachment-0001.sig>