General question about Intel and AMD virtualiztion support in hardware
Chris Adams
cmadams at hiwaay.net
Thu Nov 5 22:06:11 UTC 2009
Once upon a time, KC8LDO <kc8ldo at arrl.net> said:
> Who seems to have the edge in hardware virtualization Intel or AMD? I've
> heard comments both ways with one IT person suggesting that AMD was the way
> to go.
As far as functionality, I believe they are pretty much equivalent.
If you are buying a desktop and want virtualization, then (the last time
I looked), almost all (if not all) AMD CPUs have hw-virt extensions,
while Intel seems to reserve it for the higher-end (read: more
expensive) CPUs.
> Also are there extra "features" supported under the various open source
> virtualization systems, KVM and Xen, under one manufacture but not the
> other of any real significance?
KVM is essentially a driver for the hw-virt CPU extensions, so of course
it supports them. :-) Xen also supports hw-virt I believe.
--
Chris Adams <cmadams at hiwaay.net>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list