Easy way to remove SELinux permissions?

Daniel J Walsh dwalsh at redhat.com
Thu Sep 10 15:40:28 UTC 2009


On 09/10/2009 11:19 AM, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 10:58 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>> On 09/10/2009 01:58 AM, Sean Carlos wrote:
>>>
>>> At one point I performed a new Fedora install and restored my personal
>>> files before disabling SELinux which I don't need.
>>>
>>> As a result many files have permissions which include a dot at the end,
>>> e.g.:
>>>
>>> -rw-rw-r--.
>>>
>>> This causes havoc with many applications, i.e. gedit complains it cannot
>>> make a back-up file.
>> Open a bugzilla on this.  Having an extended attribute should not cause gedit to work to fail.
> 
> I think what is happening is this:  gedit has been instrumented to
> preserve the security.selinux attribute on files.  This works fine when
> SELinux is enabled, as SELinux applies a set of permission checks on
> setting its attributes and does not require a Linux capability /
> superuser access in doing so.  But when SELinux is disabled, setting any
> attribute in the security.* namespace is restricted to CAP_SYS_ADMIN and
> thus non-root use of gedit will fail on the setxattr() call with EPERM.
> 
I would say that gedit should check SELinux enfocing mode and if disabled continue to work.




More information about the fedora-list mailing list