Munged Headers....

[Bruno Wolff III]

On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 16:31:18 +1000,
  Cameron Simpson <cs at zip.com.au> wrote:
> 
> Bruno, I notice you're running mutt-1.5.18. I'm running 1.5.20 and it
> produces much nicer results, which are visibly good to the human eye. In
> fact it takes Frank's not properly 2407 encoded header and undoes it
> and writes an unencoded address, nice and clear.
> 
> Maybe you could upgrade - it would save a lot of bickering:-)

I have been planning to upgrade this machine for a while (both software
and replacing the hardware).

> Bruno, could you attach Frank's original message, as it is in _your_
> mail folder, to your reply for inspection? I'd like to compare it
> against my copy and the copy Ed sent me. I have trouble believing
> they're all the same.

I don't have the copy that I originally replied to. I have a copy I pulled
from the archive when I started looking in to the issue. I send you that
attachment privately and try to supply what would have been on the cc header
in the same message (without sending another copy back to the list).