[Fedora-livecd-list] Kadischi - USB fork?

Jasper O'neal Hartline jasperhartline at adelphia.net
Thu Sep 7 10:20:44 UTC 2006


Jane Dogalt wrote:

>As you mentioned, it isn't that different (in some manifestations) from the
>kadischi output.  Thus why fork instead of just making it a kadischi feature? 
>Certainly you would work in your own tree until you've got a clean feature
>addition patch, but forking doesn't make sense IMO.  Certainly kadischi should
>handle usb sticks as gracefully (or hopefully more gracefully) than knoppix,
>and a live-usb is just like sticking your livecd in the stick.
>
>I'm guessing using a fairly static ROM image might be better anyway as a lot of
>flash wouldn't hold up that well to frequent small writes (if it was used as a
>generic rw fs)
>
>  
>
Ahh I'm not planning on sending it upstream, I'm doing it just for fun.
About the small writes, we use Ext2 not Ext3.

J. Hartline




More information about the Fedora-livecd-list mailing list