[Fedora-livecd-list] cachedir conflict... bug?
Jesse Keating
jkeating at redhat.com
Tue Feb 19 19:57:33 UTC 2008
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:07:10 -0500
Jeremy Katz <katzj at redhat.com> wrote:
> Don't do that. You're basically saying that you have a repository
> named foo but foo is two different things depending on how you run.
>
> [snip]
> > Are there any genuine bugs in anything I described above?
> > Shouldn't yum warn or error out when it sees the repodata arch
> > conflict?
>
> repodata doesn't have an inherent archness. You can have repodata
> containing packages of all arches.
FWIW in pungi I use a single cache name for all arches. However for
every single run I expire the metadata and require fresh metadata be
downloaded. This seems to work for me, not many people have complained
about getting new repodata every run.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-livecd-list/attachments/20080219/fbc84664/attachment.sig>
More information about the Fedora-livecd-list
mailing list