My first (ab)use of the CVS tags

[Ville Skyttä]

On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 13:40 +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 12:57 +0200, Matthias Saou wrote:

> > So 1.1.fc3 < 1.fc4? I've been bitten too many times to be able to swear
> > that's correct without checking it first ;-) Also, since no "1.fc3"
> > package had been built, it doesn't make that much sense to bump the
> > release for the build. I personally prefer the suggestion above of
> > overwriting the tag, as long as it's used with extreme caution...
>
> 1.1.fc3 > 1.fc4 because numeric parts are considered > than alphabetic.

Yes, but I said "appending".  1.fc3.1 < 1.fc4.