libxml v1 dependencies (was: Re: multilib fun - devel packages)

[Christopher Blizzard]

I think your setting yourself up for only one possible answer here.  I
wouldn't say it's about the functionality.  It's a question of
priorities.  In this case, is keeping the functionality worth the cost
of carrying most of the Gtk 1.2 + Old Ass Gnome stack?  I think that's
how we need to frame the question.

--Chris

On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 20:56 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Jesse Keating (jkeating at j2solutions.net) said: 
> > I'm not suggesting we move it as a target issue, I'm suggesting we move
> > it as a legacy software w/ no good replacement.  I can't help that there
> > is no good replacement at this time.  It could be a temporary move to
> > Extras until such time the gtk2 version is ready for use.
> 
> I don't buy this logic - if the functionality is that important, it should
> stay; if the functionality isn't, it should go.
> 
> Bill
> 
> --
> Fedora-maintainers mailing list
> Fedora-maintainers at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers