libxml v1 dependencies
Rahul Sundaram
sundaram at redhat.com
Tue Dec 20 09:42:59 UTC 2005
Hi
>I don't understand this.
>
>You'd have different Fedora Distributions and different Fedora
>Distributors. Each one would be able to ship the collection of packages
>from the FC + FE he wants to ship.
>
>
Different vendors can already distribute Fedora.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Distribution
> The burdon/load of compiling CDs would be
>shifted away from RH, except if RH also wants to be one of these
>"vendors"
>
>
Think LUGs or conferences. RH does ship Fedora for free on these
occasions and additional CD's would cost more to redistribute.
>As it seems to me, I can't make it to you - I am questioning this kind
>of partitioning a distribution as a whole, because whatever you or RH
>considers "nominal desktop" is irrelevant to users.
>
>
>
My personal preference might be irrelevant but whatever engineering
resources being alloted to the project directly determines the level of
development and integration work. Setting aside that point , community
like I said can create their own targets based on Fedora repositories.
There would can be any of Fedora GNOME or KDE or <insert your own
target> editions. The difference is that the user can download one of
those *single* CD's based on their choice and get most of what they want.
regards
Rahul
More information about the Fedora-maintainers
mailing list