incoming: dependency warnings

[Jens Petersen]

Bill Nottingham wrote:
> seth vidal (skvidal at phy.duke.edu) said: 
> 
>>And you'll be sending a general report to the -devel list for everyone
>>to see, right?
> 
> 
> With this change, general 'these deps are broken' notes should be in
> the normal rawhide mail.

Would it be better to send it out as a separate mail from the daily
rawhide report?  Either that or perhaps restrict the deps report in
the daily rawhide mail to a single arch during the early part of the devel
cycle?  Currently it seems more to be bloating the daily rawhide mail
IMHO and a lot of the broken deps are duplicated across archs anyway.

Jens