FC4 Target tracker x86_64 (Was: Re: mismatch of versions between arches)

[Thorsten Leemhuis]

Am Donnerstag, den 12.05.2005, 08:25 -0400 schrieb Greg DeKoenigsberg:
> +1
> 
> Tracker bugs are good in so many ways.

x86_64:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=157553


> On Thu, 12 May 2005, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> 
> > Am Donnerstag, den 12.05.2005, 08:55 +0200 schrieb Michael Schwendt:
> > > On Thu, 12 May 2005 16:32:06 +1000, Colin Charles wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 07:36 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > > > How about the date get set to start around 26th May? This gives us
> > > > relatively enough time to rebuild, and get things fixed before 6th June.
> > > Fedora Extras FC4 target bugs
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=157183
> > > 
> > > (would be great if the dep tree listed the architecture, too, btw)
> > 
> > We could create more tracker bugs: "FC4 x86_64 tracker"  "FC4 ppc
> > tracker"; Those could be dep bugs for the "FC4 general tracker" bug. You
> > would see the arch deps in that dependecytree then. 
> > 
> > Similar like Bug 155836 in the dep-tree of 
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=136450
> > 
> > I was planing something like that anyway to track x86_64 bugs better.
> > 
> > Just my 2 cent
> > 
> > -- 
> > Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora at leemhuis.info>
> > 
> > --
> > Fedora-maintainers mailing list
> > Fedora-maintainers at redhat.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
> > 
> 
> --
> Fedora-maintainers mailing list
> Fedora-maintainers at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
> 
-- 
Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora at leemhuis.info>