mismatch of versions between arches

[Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams]

On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 13:34 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 19 May 2005 06:02:18 -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
> 
> > > kphone
> > > ktrack
> > > libosip2
> > > pam_mysql
> > 
> > Interesting. The PPC packages are exactly 1 release behind the i386 and
> > x86_64 packages. Any possible explanations?
> 
> "rpm -qpi" is your friend. It should show that these ppc builds come from
> a different build host when the Fedora Extras build system did only
> support i386 and x86_64.

In that case would anyone take issue with me requesting builds of the
current CVS for these 4 packages as well as python-amara, python-
HTMLgen, and repoml?

-- 
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez at ivazquez.net>
http://fedora.ivazquez.net/

gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20050519/58946a30/attachment.sig>