The impending end of FC2 NEEDINFO bugs...

[Warren Togami]

Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 07:05:43PM -0400, Christopher Aillon wrote:
> 
>>Should the owners also change to a default fedora-legacy owner of some 
>>sort?  I don't really plan on dealing with the FC2 bugs I own.
> 
> 
> Well, sort of the idea is that Fedora Legacy won't be either.
> 
> bugzilla.redhat.com tells me that a resolution of deferred means "The
> problem described is a bug which will not be fixed in this version of the
> product." I think that should convey exactly what you just said. :)
> 
> As before, I'll include a short message explaining what's going on.

I don't think it should be DEFERRED but rather CURRENTRELEASE.  DEFERRED 
implies that the bug intends to be revisited later, which is not the 
case.  They were given a chance to change the bug from FC2 to a newer 
release and NEEDINFO status.  If they haven't responded by now just 
assume it is fixed, and tell them about changing the Version and 
reopening if not.

Warren Togami
wtogami at redhat.com