The impending end of FC2 NEEDINFO bugs...

[Mike A. Harris]

Tom Lane wrote:
> Miloslav Trmac <mitr at redhat.com> writes:
> 
>>On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 03:38:36AM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
>>
>>>Setting status to "CURRENTRELEASE", however if you still
>>>experience this problem after updating to our latest Fedora
>>>Core release and are still interested in Red Hat tracking
>>>the issue, and assisting in troubleshooting the problem,
>>>please feel free to provide the information requested above,
>>>and reopen the report.
> 
> 
>>This is also abusing the bugzilla resolution status; if somebody
>>looks for a bug he is experiencing and finds it, he sees
>>"CURRENTRELEASE" when in fact it is "WE-WISH-IT-WERE-CURRENTRELEASE".
>>NOTABUG nor WONTFIX is perfect, but either provides more correct
>>information than CURRENTRELEASE.
> 
> 
> Is there a reason not to leave such bugs in NEEDINFO state forever?

Yes.  Then there are 100000 bugs open forever, that will never
be addressed.