new for FC6 and later: Package Review!

[Brian Pepple]

On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 11:28 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 11:21 -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 00:33 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > 
> > > Do Core package maintainers accept the current FE packaging guidelines? Or
> > > will reviews result in lengthy discussions about personal preferences?
> > 
> > Obviously, there will always be some contention.  This isn't just due to
> > personal egos; 
> 
> A Huge amount of the bullshit has been b/c of egos, though.
> 

That's what I've noticed so far also, which really makes me unmotivated
to look at these packages.

/B
-- 
Brian Pepple <bdpepple at ameritech.net>

gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20060418/184507f1/attachment.sig>