Free Software audit update
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
dominik at greysector.net
Fri Aug 18 21:59:27 UTC 2006
On Friday, 18 August 2006 at 23:30, Rahul wrote:
> Patrice Dumas wrote:
> >On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 03:58:39PM -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
> >>THE KNOWNS (2):
> >>Packages with non-free licenses that need to be taken out of Fedora Core
> >>and moved to Fedora Extras (or trashed entirely)
> >>#######################################################################
> >>openmotif-* || Open Group Public || Bugzilla 202527
> >
> >openmotif doesn't seems to me to be free enough to be in fedora extras,
> >since it hasn't an OSI compatible licence.
> >
>
> Fedora Core packages dependent on openmotif are xpdf, ddd. tetex-xdvi,
> mesa-libGLw as stated in the above bug report. If there are many
> packages dependent on openmotif in Fedora Extras we could do this as a
> two step process.
>
> * Move all openmotif dependencies and openmotif itself into Fedora Extras
> * Fix or drop packages as necessary.
>
> The advantage of moving it into Fedora Extras is that the broader
> community of packages can work on this and resolve things faster.
Too bad. I'm working on getting a package (opendx) which depends on openmotif
into Extras. Any viable openmotif replacements?
Regards,
R.
--
Fedora Extras contributor http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DominikMierzejewski
MPlayer developer http://rpm.greysector.net/mplayer/
"Faith manages."
-- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"
More information about the Fedora-maintainers
mailing list