Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-12-02

[Axel Thimm]

On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 11:00:16AM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >Axel.Thimm AT ATrpms.net:
> >    smart
> >      FE4 > FE7 (0:0.42-40.fc4 > 0:0.42-39.fc6)
> >      FE5 > FE7 (0:0.42-40.fc5 > 0:0.42-39.fc6)
> >      FE6 > FE7 (0:0.42-40.fc6 > 0:0.42-39.fc6)
> 
> I wonder if it would be reasonable to suppress rawhide in this report
> until we get closer to test time.  Since rawhide occasionally doesn't
> build, and maintainers often concentrate on released versions when
> fixing important bugs or pushing security fixes, the information often
> isn't pertinent.

FWIW the smart build fails on KDE not liking the newest autoconf:

*** YOU'RE USING autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.61.
*** KDE requires autoconf 2.52, 2.53 or 2.54

Are there other packages affected that way?

But I agree rawhide in fast development mode creates a lot of noise in
such reports. Maybe two sections, one w/o rawhide and one only
checking releases vs rawhide?
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20061202/84d85bce/attachment.sig>