Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-12-02

Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
Sat Dec 2 18:16:22 UTC 2006


Le samedi 02 décembre 2006 à 11:00 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III a écrit :
> >Axel.Thimm AT ATrpms.net:
> >    smart
> >      FE4 > FE7 (0:0.42-40.fc4 > 0:0.42-39.fc6)
> >      FE5 > FE7 (0:0.42-40.fc5 > 0:0.42-39.fc6)
> >      FE6 > FE7 (0:0.42-40.fc6 > 0:0.42-39.fc6)
> 
> I wonder if it would be reasonable to suppress rawhide in this report
> until we get closer to test time.  Since rawhide occasionally doesn't
> build, and maintainers often concentrate on released versions when
> fixing important bugs or pushing security fixes, the information often
> isn't pertinent.

I wonder how you think you'll get any rawhide testers if maintainers are
encouraged to let rawhide bitrot till test1.

Also, I wonder how many people will dare test test1 if no one ran devel
before.

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20061202/6a010bc2/attachment.sig>


More information about the Fedora-maintainers mailing list