icon cache scriplet guideline update

[Rex Dieter]

Callum Lerwick wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 07:43 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> Because, frankly, poo-pooing the current proposal/guidelines in favor of 
>> some handy-wavy theoretical lacking-actual-implementation solution, is 
>> no solution.
> 
> Well, the point is, the current proposal does not address the "multiple
> packages needlessly updating caches multiple times" problem at all. 

Fair enough, I'll investigate hooking into rpm's %posttrans hooks.  My 
findings so far are promising.

>Thus people are questioning what problem this proposal actually solves.

I've repeated myself several times what the current proposal does and 
does not address (it's also *in* the proposal itself).  If folks, can't 
read, I can't help that.  If folks disagree with the assertions:
* packaging guidelines should not include toolkit-specific optimization 
hacks.
* packaging guidelines should reference upstream specs/standards
then just frickin say so.

-- Rex