Summary from yesterdays (mini) FESCo meeting

[Jesse Keating]

On Friday 29 December 2006 11:32, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> So, you should just copy and paste all of the guidelines into the
> review? :-)  Because the fact that the package follows the guidelines is
> what is supposed to be checked, not just some subset.
>
> A much better check and balance is exactly what happened in this case;
> dgilmore saw something suspicious and held off on the branch request.
> The next step would be either just doing just sort of a quick review or
> asking someone else to do a quick pass with such a review... such random
> and spot checks of reviews will go a long way towards verification.

Sure, that's best of all.  I didn't make that clear in my message.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20061229/232dec81/attachment.sig>