Summary from yesterdays (mini) FESCo meeting

Brian Pepple bpepple at fedoraproject.org
Fri Dec 29 16:33:44 UTC 2006


On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 11:19 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
> I'd be more in favor of a 
> rule that just says "items checked need to be listed out in the review before 
> building of the package will be allowed".  Vague enough as to not give 
> reviewers a shortcut.

That sounds fine to me.  The problem I had was reviewers just putting
'APPROVED' in reviews, and not giving any information on what was
actually checked.

/B
-- 
Brian Pepple <bpepple at fedoraproject.org>

gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20061229/3f551361/attachment.sig>


More information about the Fedora-maintainers mailing list