Summary from yesterdays (mini) FESCo meeting

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Sat Dec 30 16:36:13 UTC 2006


On Saturday 30 December 2006 06:00, Axel Thimm wrote:
> Why does it have to be all or nothing? So you either just stamp off a
> package review with a terse aproval notice or have to write a book on
> it? Try to find a middle ground, which is posting a checklist and
> anything else you want to post. Other people have done this
> successfully, check their reviews.

The checklist is just a condensed version of the guidelines, that will be 
copied pasted.  It is no more valuable than a 'APPROVED'.  Anybody could 
copy/paste the checklist, especially if there are items that don't apply 
(python checks for a perl package).  The only thing it would prove is that 
they copied the most recent checklist.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20061230/06ac250d/attachment.sig>


More information about the Fedora-maintainers mailing list