Summary from yesterdays (mini) FESCo meeting

[Jesse Keating]

On Saturday 30 December 2006 10:52, Axel Thimm wrote:
> So for checking whether your single-worded "APPROVED" is correct or
> not the whole work needs to be repeated instead of checking that you
> reviewed the mandatory items. Sorry, but that's nowhere near quality
> control.

Just looking to see if the checklist was pasted isn't quality control either.  
The only way to _actually_ check that things were reviewed is to do the 
review yourself.  A spot check.  Anything less is trusting the reviewer did 
the right thing, and if you're already doing that, what does it matter if 
they just listed APPROVED or if they copy/pasted a long list of check items?

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20061230/805824b2/attachment.sig>