Summary from yesterdays (mini) FESCo meeting

[Axel Thimm]

On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 06:03:30PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Dec 2006 11:44:15 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
> 
> > > > The packaging policy does evolve, and will continue to evolve, and
> > > > I do my best to adhere to the stated guidance. If I'm not reading
> > > > over the guidelines as I do any reviews, I'm garunteed to miss a
> > > > policy change.
> > > 
> > > > Right now I spend too much time reading over all the guidance
> > > > looking for changes everytime I do a review.
> > > 
> > > The scenario you describe is unacceptable.
> > 
> > Only because you trimmed the part where Jeff is asking for keeping a
> > checklist up2date with change dates attached to the items :)
> 
> "Unacceptable" = having to revisit the Wiki pages and their
> changelogs frequently in search of any important updates that have
> not been announced in proper communication channels.

Os simply checking the date field in Jeff's proposal ...

Please check Jeff's full post again.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20061230/26f5a969/attachment.sig>