Summary from yesterdays (mini) FESCo meeting

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Sat Dec 30 17:40:00 UTC 2006


On Saturday 30 December 2006 12:38, Axel Thimm wrote:
> If you do find a broken review item and you have a checklist where the
> reviewer explicitely marked this item as checked, then you know that
> he was wrong or extremely sloppy. When doing a simple APPROVED you
> can't tell whether he missed it for thinking he has memorized all
> guidelines.

I don't buy this.  "Extremely sloppy" could be that he just copied/pasted.  It 
is no more valuable than APPROVED.  Either way the reviewer missed something 
and needs to reeducate themselves.  Pasting a checklist adds no value.  Only 
harm.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20061230/42141f35/attachment.sig>


More information about the Fedora-maintainers mailing list