Summary from yesterdays (mini) FESCo meeting
Jesse Keating
jkeating at redhat.com
Sat Dec 30 17:40:00 UTC 2006
On Saturday 30 December 2006 12:38, Axel Thimm wrote:
> If you do find a broken review item and you have a checklist where the
> reviewer explicitely marked this item as checked, then you know that
> he was wrong or extremely sloppy. When doing a simple APPROVED you
> can't tell whether he missed it for thinking he has memorized all
> guidelines.
I don't buy this. "Extremely sloppy" could be that he just copied/pasted. It
is no more valuable than APPROVED. Either way the reviewer missed something
and needs to reeducate themselves. Pasting a checklist adds no value. Only
harm.
--
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20061230/42141f35/attachment.sig>
More information about the Fedora-maintainers
mailing list